NEW YORK (AP) – While some professional journalists have faced hostility and attacks as they covered the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, the great irony is that so many people involved in the The insurgency was doing their job for them.
This is evident with the New York Times publication of “Day of Rage,” a 40-minute video investigation that scrutinizes the events of the day. The Times team collected thousands of videos, starting on the afternoon of Jan.6, many of which were posted on social media by the rioters themselves, said Malachy Browne, senior producer of the Times visual investigation team.
âAs many participants realized what they had done and its implications, much of it was deleted,â Browne said.
Too late. The Times had already protected its own copies.
It was a difficult day for some of the journalists who covered the attack. Associated Press and Times photojournalists were abused and some AP equipment used to document the event was damaged.
In “Day of Rage”, the newspaper used the collected footage, along with other material such as the police body camera film and archived audio from police communications, to recreate the event as de. many angles. Through the use of time stamps and knowledge of people’s locations, for example, The Times found footage of a freelance videographer who did not realize he captured the attack that led to on the death of Capitol Hill Police Officer Brian Sicknick, Browne said. Sicknick collapsed and later died after engaging with protesters. He was sprayed with chemical irritants, but a medical examiner determined he died of natural causes.
The Times was able to determine that rioters had violated the Capitol in eight separate locations.
Elsewhere, the footage laid bare the intent of many rioters, such as when former President Donald Trump’s speech at the pre-riot rally was juxtaposed with what was said in his audience as he spoke.
Times investigation concludes that the House’s delay in ending the electoral certification debate until rioters showed up outside the chamber contributed to the shooting by Ashli ââpolice Babbitt, a Californian who had joined the crowd that had breached the building.
The project portrays law enforcement as overwhelmed, in part because of the lack of preparation of their superiors. The footage, some of which has been seen in other locations over the past few months, contains surprising moments: a policeman tricking a rioter to move in one direction while senators take to safety in the background, an employee House barricaded in an office whispering to a colleague as a door is knocked from outside.
As the footage shows the efforts of members of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, showing off their bulletproof vests, weapons, radio communications and organized movements, the Times concludes that the majority of the rioters were Trump supporters caught up in the field. the frenzy of action.
âFor many in the crowd, they felt they were doing a duty to defend democracy as they saw it,â Browne said.
The Times article had nine signatures, but Browne estimated that around 15-20 reporters were involved in its preparation. Even before the documentary’s release on Wednesday night, the results have contributed to the newspaper’s reporting of the incident in recent months.
Browne, who also narrates the video, doesn’t mince words to tell viewers what has been concluded.
“Our reconstruction shows the Capitol riot for what it was – a violent assault, encouraged by the president, against a seat of democracy he has sworn to protect,” he said in the documentary.
The film also shows a congressman comparing rioters to tourists. âIt wasn’t a sightseeing tour,â Browne says, âand the proof is in the pictures.â
The Times investigation may take on added significance given the government’s halt to efforts to fully investigate what happened that day.
âI think recent events have made a presentation like this more valuable,â he said. âMaybe that will create pressure for the investigation. I do not know. Our intention is not to influence politicians or politicians, but to really show the public what happened in the fullest possible way. “